Saturday 29 March 2014

The Militant Goodness of God



I delivered three lectures  in three churches over three weeks following Ash Wednesday as part of the programme of ChurchesTogether for Chipping Barnet.
The first lecture explored the exquisite but disturbing poetry of Nahum.  Its content may be unsuitable for anyone under the age of 15 as it contains frequent strong violence, including brief scenes of depicting sexual violence.
Nahum is a pronouncement against Nineveh, the seat of the Assyrian Empire in the seventh century BC.  The empire is renowned for its cruelty, not least because of its own propaganda, much of which is now visible in the British Museum.  But the document is above all a revelation of who God is, a God whose severity in dealing with evil is a comfort to those who suffer.  “Good is YHWH – as a stronghold – in the day of distress.”
What does it mean for God to be good? Nahum takes up verses from Exodus 34 in which God, having revealed his name – YHWH, “I am who I am” – further discloses his character.  Nahum gives this verses a twist in a carefully organised poem which stresses that while God is indeed slow to (act on his) anger, he is nevertheless consistently and fiercely opposed to evil.  In fact, he is constantly angry when faced with evil or, to put it differently, he is constant in his anger.  Unlike us, God does not flare up in anger, overcome by passions.  His anger is calm and measured but in due course fully effective.
Hating evil is the counterpart of loving good.  Defeating enemies is the counterpart to protecting those who take refuge in him.  It is good news that God’s goodness is militant.  God does not tolerate evil – ever.  God does not accommodate himself to evil – ever. God does not give in to evil – ever.
This is why the cross is necessary.  God forgives evildoers without tolerating evil.  Forgiveness costs something because it is not a matter of saying “it doesn’t matter” or “it was no big deal” or “let’s just forget about it”.  Forgiving is not the same as ignoring wrongdoing.  It is acknowledging that wrong has been done without letting this destroy a relationship. 
On the cross God shows his opposition to wrongdoing.  He crosses out evil, forgiving evildoers while at the same time demonstrating his fierce opposition to evil.
We explored four images used in Nahum to break the hold Nineveh had on the imagination of God’s people, four images designed to take away the fear.
(1) Nineveh, the beautiful garden city which may well have hosted the real “Babylonian” Hanging Gardens will a pool whose water runs away.  Pools and canals were a symbol of order just as the sea was a symbol of chaos.  The draining of Nineveh’s pools envisages the erasure of Assyrian order in line with the claim represented by the structure of the opening poem that God’s order, while hidden and in some ways compromised, will prevail.
(2) Assyrian chariots were a symbol of their power.  The picture of such chariots going up in smoke is meant to reassure the people of God that Assyrian power will not prevail.
(3) The Assyrian king portrayed himself as the lion-hunter par excellence. No-one else was allowed to kill lions.  Finishing off a lion was royal business and demonstrated sovereignty.  In Nahum’s poetry the Assyrian king becomes a lion who is unable to hold on to his prey and provide for his own.  YHWH is the true king because he is the one who will bring about this state of affairs.
(4) Nineveh is also portrayed as a prostitute who will be publicly humiliated so that its falsehood will be fully exposed.
We usually belittle only those we consider “beneath” us but in so far as belittling can ever have a positive effect it must be a belittling that helps us keep things in perspective, making the frightful things that hover over us smaller.  Nahum suggests that this is best done by magnifying God.  Keeping God’s sovereignty and power, his majesty and ability to keep order high on our minds can ensure that other things do not become too big for us.